Cayetano: I’m still Senate president; Blue Ribbon probe to proceed

1 hour ago 1
Suniway Group of Companies Inc.

Upgrade to High-Speed Internet for only ₱1499/month!

Enjoy up to 100 Mbps fiber broadband, perfect for browsing, streaming, and gaming.

Visit Suniway.ph to learn

Marc Jayson Cayabyab - The Philippine Star

June 4, 2026 | 12:00am

Senate President Alan Peter Cayetano holds a press briefing at the Senate on Wednesday, claiming he did not know on Sunday night, May 10, whether Sen. Bato dela Rosa would come to the Senate.

The STAR / Ryan Baldemor

MANILA, Philippines —  Showing no signs of relinquishing his post, Sen. Alan Peter Cayetano maintained that he is still the Senate president and that the scheduled Blue Ribbon committee hearing today will proceed.

“I’m issuing a memo to the Secretariat and to the Office of the Sergeant-of-Arms to keep the Senate open tomorrow,” Cayetano said yesterday on Facebook Live.

Today’s supposed Blue Ribbon session will hear yet again the testimonies of the “18 Ex-Marines” who alleged to have delivered suitcases of kickbacks to administration allies.

“Tomorrow, the Blue Ribbon committee pushes through. We have to hear the testimonies. Even the ones who committed illegal acts today, they are invited,” he said, clearly pertaining to his Senate colleagues led by new Senate President Pro Tempore Sherwin Gatchalian.

“You can try to stop us, but you will be stopping the Filipino people,” Cayetano said.

He urged his supporters to have a prayer vigil in the Senate today in case the new leadership prevents them from entering the building to hold the session.

“I am still the legitimate, legal, moral Senate President of the Republic of the Philippines,” Cayetano insisted on Facebook Live.

Cayetano denied that he was sparking a constitutional crisis by insisting on his invalidated Senate presidency.

“We will have the Blue Ribbon committee. As Senate President, the Senate premises are under my authority. Do not padlock the Senate. Do not have an excuse that there is a rally. There is always a rally outside the Senate,” Cayetano said.

Cayetano’s insistence that there would be a Blue Ribbon hearing today despite the leadership change did not sit well with the new Blue Ribbon chair, Sen. Erwin Tulfo, who replaces Sen. Pia Cayetano.

At a press briefing after their takeover, Tulfo said he will instead schedule the resumption of the Blue Ribbon flood control probe on Monday.

If the former majority led by Sen. Rodante Marcoleta insist on pushing through with the Blue Ribbon schedule today, they will not be allowed to do so in the session hall, Tulfo added.

The new Blue Ribbon chair also said all senators will be invited to take part in the hearing “so that no one can claim that there is magic behind the scenes.”

Before yesterday’s leadership takeover, Cayetano went on Facebook around lunchtime with Marcoleta, tapped as Blue Ribbon vice chair.

Cayetano in that livestream defended today’s supposed flood control probe amid criticisms by Sen. Raffy Tulfo that the Blue Ribbon committee was a “bastard committee” illegally created by Cayetano’s leadership.

Loren cries foul

Sen. Loren Legarda in a statement raised “serious constitutional concerns, pointing out that no senator can validly act as Senate president on the strength of only 12 votes.”

“Under Article VI, Section 16(1) of the 1987 Constitution, ‘The Senate shall elect its President by a majority vote of all its respective Members.’ Since the Senate is composed of 24 Senators, that majority is 13. By the fact that the Senators present did not have 13 votes, they could not validly elect a Senate president or authorize any senator to act as Senate president,” she said.

“Under Rule II, Section 2 of the Rules of the Senate, ‘The officers of the Senate shall be elected by the majority vote of all its members.’ This means that the Senate President Pro Tempore, the Senate Secretary and the Sergeant-at-Arms also required at least 13 votes,” the former Senate president pro tempore added.

“We remain firm in our respect for the Constitution,” Legarda noted. “Any proceeding conducted without the constitutionally required quorum raises serious questions of validity and cannot be recognized as consistent with the clear mandate of the Constitution.” – Rainier Allan Ronda, Louella Desiderio, Evelyn Macairan

Read Entire Article